DigitalSE Logo

Architecting a Tradespace Analysis Framework in a Digital Engineering Environment

Abstract

The design spaces for systems or systems of systems continue to grow in complexity. To support the management of this complexity, digital engineering environments are being stood up with the intent to support the creation of digital threads, connecting guidance with mission needs down to specific capability requirements. Furthermore, it is intended to integrate various types of models and simulations used for upfront analysis as well as downstream operations and management. This chapter provides guidance on the processes to design and implement a tradespace environment within a digital engineering environment. Specifics on the elements of a complete analysis framework, an exemplar workflow of one's use, and a summary of key lessons learned and takeaways is provided. This chapter's goal is to inform the reader on the practical processes and approaches to realize a successful tradespace analysis framework.


Leads

Daniel Browne

Georgia Tech Research Institute

Santiago Balestrini-Robinson

Georgia Tech Research Institute

David Fullmer

Georgia Tech Research Institute

Publications

  1. Ackoff , R.L. ( 1989 ). From data to wisdom . Journal of applied systems analysis 16 ( 1 ): 3 – 9 .

  2. Bostock , M ( 2021 ). D3 Data driven documents . Library released under BSD license. Copyright 2021 Mike Bostock.

  3. Elsawah , S. , Guillaume , J.H. , Filatova , T. et al. ( 2015 ). A methodology for eliciting, representing, and analysing stakeholder knowledge for decision making on complex socio-ecological systems: from cognitive maps to agent-based models . Journal of Environmental Management 151 : 500 – 516 .

  4. Kluyver , T. , Ragan-Kelley , B. , Perez , F. et al. ( 2016 ). Jupyter Notebooks - a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows . In: Positioning and Power in Academic Publishing: Players, Agents and Agendas (ed. F. Loizides and B. Schmidt ), 87 – 90 . IOS Press .

  5. Landauer , C. ( 1998 ). Data, information, knowledge, understanding: computing up the meaning hierarchy . In: SMC'98 Conference Proceedings , 2255 – 2260 . San Diego, CA, USA : IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No. 98CH36218). doi:

  6. Lubars , M. , Potts , C. , and Richter , C. ( 1993 ). A review of the state of the practice in requirements modeling . Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering , San Diego, CA, USA (6 January 1993). pp. 2 – 14 . IEEE .

  7. Rowley , J. ( 2007 ). The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy . Journal of Information Science 33 ( 2 ): 163 – 180 .

  8. West , T.D. and Birkmire , B. ( 2020 ). AFSIM: The Air Force Research Laboratory's approach to making M&S ubiquitous in the Weapon System Concept Development process . Cybersecurity & Information Systems Information Analysis Center (CSIAC) 7 ( 3 ): 50 – 55 .

SERC Logo

The Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) was established in the Fall of 2008 as a government-designated University Affiliated Research Center (UARC). The SERC has produced 15 years of research, focused on an updated systems engineering toolkit (methods, tools, and practices) for the complex cyber-physical systems of today and tomorrow.


Follow us on

LinkedIn