DigitalSE Logo

Expedited Systems Engineering for Rapid Capability

Abstract

In the modern development environment, systems are more complex, interconnected, software-intensive, and driven by “time to market.” This is also true for defense systems when responding to urgent operational needs. These programs cannot avoid the time to focus on complete satisfaction of static requirements, immature technology maturation, and long lifecycle considerations. The method used in this research is grounded theory, with data coming from site visit notes of unstructured interviews conducted with leadership at organizations known for rapid development. The responses showed that rapid development requires an integrated approach with considerations for People, Process, and Product. These organizations seek out flexibility in engineering, hiring, and contracting processes, and the development fits into one of four lanes of acquisition. Further analysis reflects findings pertaining to efficient information/knowledge sharing, generally, but not exclusively achieved by small team collocation. These organizations were mindful of risk but were not risk adverse. Rapid projects demonstrated organizational ambidexterity and real-time management and decision-making. Lastly, the research observed an enthusiasm that is infectious throughout these organizations that regularly practice “rapid” successfully, with a culture that fosters a “go-fast” ethos.

Leads

John M. Colombi

Air Force Institute of Technology

Publications

  1. Anderson, D.J. (2010). Kanban: Successful Evolutionary Change in Your Technology Business. Sequim, Washington: Blue Hole Press.

  2. Birkinsha, J. and Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review 45: 47–55.

  3. Boehm, B. (2010). System 2020 – Strategic Initiative. SERC SERC-2010-TR-009-1. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA637406 (accessed 1 June 2023).

  4. Boynton, A. and Zmud, R. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management Review 25 (4): 17–27.

  5. Bullen, C.V. and Rockart, J.F. (1981). A Primer on Critical Success Factors. MIT Libraries, Report no. 1220-81. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1988.

  6. Cebrowski, A.K. and Raymond, J.W. (2005). Operationally responsive space: a new defense business model. Parameters 35 (2): https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2250.

  7. Chun, T., Ylona, M.B., and Karen, F. (2019a). Grounded theory research: a design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine 7 (January): https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927.

  8. Chun, T., Ylona, M.B., and Karen, F. (2019b). Playing the game: a grounded theory of the integration of international nurses. Collegian 26 (4): 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.12.006.

  9. Cunningham, W. (1992). The Wycash Portfolio Management System. Experience Report.

  10. Cunningham, W. (2011). Ward explains debt metaphor. http://wiki.c2.com/?WardExplainsDebtMetaph or (accessed 1 June 2023).

  11. DAU (2022). Acquisition Categories (ACATs) | Adaptive Acquisition Framework. Major Capability Acquisition. https://aaf.dau.edu/aaf/mca/acat/.

  12. DoD (2010). Rapid Capability Fielding Toolbox Study. Washington DC: DoD https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA528118.

  13. DSB (2009). Fulfillment of Urgent Operational Needs. Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force ADA503382. https://dsb.cto.mil/reports/2000s/ADA503382.pdf (accessed 1 June 2023).

  14. Edmondson, A.C. (2008). Managing the risk of learning: psychological safety in work teams. In: International Handbook of Organizational Teamwork and Cooperative Working (ed. M.A. West, D. Tjosvold, and K.G. Smith), 255–275. Chichester, UK: Wiley https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470696712.ch13.

  15. Edmondson, A.C. and Roloff, K.S. (2009). Overcoming barriers to collaboration: psychological safety and learning in diverse teams. In: Team Effectiveness in Complex Organizations: Cross-disciplinary Perspectives and Approaches (ed. E. Salas, G.F. Goodwin, and C.S. Burke), 183–208.

  16. Edwards, J. (2022). Rolls-Royce, Boeing Use Digital Design Methods to Update B-52 Components. ExecutiveBiz. March 14, 2022. https://blog.executivebiz.com/2022/03/rolls-royce-boeing-use-digital-design-methods-to-update-b-52-engines-systems/ (accessed 1 June 2023).

  17. GAO (2010). Warfighter support: improvements to DOD’s urgent needs processes would enhance oversight and expedite efforts to meet critical Warfighter needs. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-10-460 (accessed 1 June 2023).

  18. GAO (2011). Warfighter support: DOD’s urgent needs processes need a more comprehensive approach and evaluation for potential consolidation. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-11-273 (accessed 1 June 2023).

  19. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for QualitativeResearch. Aldine.

  20. Hanawalt, E.S. and Rouse, W.B. (2009). Car wars: factors underlying the success or failure of new car programs. Systems Engineering 4 (13): 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20158.

  21. Lamb, C.J., Schmidt, M.J., and Fitzsimmons, B.G. (2009). MRAPs, Irregular Warfare, and Pentagon Reform, 62. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA515185.

  22. Lane, J.A., Boehm, B., Bolas, M. et al. (2010). Critical success factors for rapid, innovative solutions. In: New Modeling Concepts for Today’s Software Processes, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (ed. J. Münch, Y. Yang, and W. Schäfer), 52–61. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14347-2_6.

  23. Lencioni, P.M. (2011). The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable. 1st ed. Jossey-Bass.

  24. Losey, S. (2020). T-7 Red Hawk Trainer Makes Its Debut. Defense News. https://www.defensenews.com/air/2022/04/29/t-7-red-hawk-trainer-makes-its-debut/.

  25. Morgan, J. and Liker, J.K. (2020). The Toyota Product Development System: Integrating People, Process, and Technology. New York: Productivity Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781482293746.

  26. Muffatto, M. and Roveda, M. (2000). Developing product platforms: analysis of the development process. Technovation 20 (11): 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00178-9.

  27. Murman, E., Allen, T., Bozdogan, K. et al. (2002). Lean Enterprise Value: Insights from MIT’s Lean Aerospace Initiative. 2002nd ed. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  28. NASA (2018). Launch Services Risk Mitigation Policy for NASA-Owned and/or NASA-Sponsored Payloads/Missions. NASA Policy Directive (NPD) 8610.7D. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?t=NPD&c=8610&s=7D.

  29. NASA (2021). Risk Classification for NASA Payloads. NASA Procedural Requirements (NPR) 8705.4A. https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov/displayDir.cfm?t=NPR&c=8705&s=4A.

  30. Oehmen, J., Oppenheim, B.W., Secor D., et al. (2012). The Guide to Lean Enablers for Managing Engineering Programs. Joint MIT-PMI-INCOSE Community of Practice on Lean in Program Management. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/70495 (accessed 1 June 2023).

  31. Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). (2020). Operation of the Adaptive Acquisition Framework. DOD INSTRUCTION 5000.02.

  32. Osborn, K. (2020). Air Force Flies 6th Gen Stealth Fighter -‘Super Fast’ With Digital Engineering. Warrior Maven: Center for Military Modernization. https://warriormaven.com/future-weapons/air-force-flies-6th-gen-stealth-fighter-super-fast-with-digital-engineering.

  33. OSD (2018). Digital Engineering Strategy. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Systems Engineering.

  34. Rosenburg, D. (2003). Inside Monster Garage: The Builds, the Skills, the Thrills. Meredith Corporation https://www.abebooks.com/9780696218903/Monster-Garage-Builds-Skills-Thrills-0696218909/plp.

  35. Rupp, S. (2007). Operationally Responsive Space. Kirtland Air Force Base. https://www.kirtland.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/390430/operationally-responsive-space/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kirtland.af.mil%2FNews%2FArticle-Display%2FArticle%2F390430%2Foperationally-responsive-space%2F.

  36. Van Secter, D. and Doolen, T.. (2011). Comparative Analysis of Critical Success Factor Research. 61st Annual IIE Conference Proceedings.

  37. Waterman, S. (2022). GBSD Using Digital Twinning at Every Stage of The Program Lifecycle. Air & Space Forces Magazine. (8 April). https://www.airforcemag.com/gbsd-using-digital-twinning-at-every-stage-of-the-program-lifecycle%EF%BF%BC/.

SERC Logo

The Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC) was established in the Fall of 2008 as a government-designated University Affiliated Research Center (UARC). The SERC has produced 15 years of research, focused on an updated systems engineering toolkit (methods, tools, and practices) for the complex cyber-physical systems of today and tomorrow.


Follow us on

LinkedIn